Read 22 comments as:
Filter By
Yes, NLUs don't hold a candle to premier IITs, IIMs and AIIMS. If you ask the folks there, they'll give the excuse of law being a profession and blah blah. But the truth is, law isn't that lucrative until you can work hard after the law school.
Adding to this, the mainstream media neglects NLUs as well. Even Ashoka gets more importance. Even if a crow shits on the Ashoka campus, the newspapers, The Wire etc will give it coverage.
You are right. Law is an interesting subject but legal profession (and people joining this profession) is another story.
They have never had as good a placement as NALSAR or NUJS in the last decade.
Letโ€™s not bring NUJS into this convo. Their kids literally skip exams to keep interning and get PPOs. No other tier-1 NLU allows such laxity in academic discipline, not even NLUJ.
Yet the kids from other NLUs don't really seem to have any better legal training either. It's almost as if the exams designed in law school aren't the only metric of your ability to learn and practise law! Imagine that!
Your claim is not accurate. Only a handful of NUJS students do even as many as four corporate internships before getting the PPO.
Why don't you publish a proper report of your placement first, something which you haven't done in a decade?
No, it doesn't. Neither of those exams has got anything to do with your legal studies.
Clearly youโ€™re not from a top NLU. There is an obvious difference even in law firms and litigation between candidates from tier-1 NLUs and the folks from other random places.
No one cares in law firms if youโ€™re from a t1 nlu or from an nlu at all
What do you mean by depth of thought? Why do you think law school teachers lack it? And how do we develop it in students? The readings in top law schools are as rigorous as it can get, so suggestions are welcome.
Dude, I have seen even tier-2 NLU grads favour their own crappy alums. Nothing wrong if someone from NLS or NUJS, etc favour one of their own. Theyโ€™re generally far better.