We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Jibes of gobar chap and gau mutra (amongst others) reportedly used by her.
When called out she claims account was hacked.
See tweets here: https://x.com/ThePulkitSBisht/status/1746830015680155836
In any case she is a Hindu so her speech cannot be Hinduphobic. Just like a Muslim cannot commit Islamophobia
Honestly looking at how yall talk I really worry about lawyers in this country not knowing their ass from their elbow.
As an aside, we do not know whether the good professor would consent to be described as a Hindu. Many Indian intellectuals from Hindu background, i.e., whose parents would consider themselves Hindu, have made a habit of playing down their own cultural heritage — the same heritage which enabled their family to not indoctrinate them into an exclusive creed — just so they can establish their ideological purity among their fellow comrades. Because they see their cause as progressive, they do not consider their own intellectual conformity as a problem.
https://www.opindia.com/2022/02/jindal-global-law-school-calls-jk-india-occupied-kashmir/
Credentials of Shruti Pandey: https://www.opindia.com/2021/10/shruti-pandey-jindal-global-llaw-faculty-hindu-untouchability/
That they did all this during their classes and from a position of power as teachers is a textbook example of infecting pedagogy with blatant partisanship in service of indoctrination.