We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Most societies developed secular commercial laws as trading routes opened up and colonisation began. in that day age - the vakil’s who played the role of lawyers were from mercantile classes. Religious law was relegated to private sphere where priestly classes retained control.
Since independence and reservations - opportunities have opened up for Dalits and Adivasis some. What counts as law has changed. No more going to a panchayat over a dispute about land or a custody dispute- you go to civil court of family court and you interpret statues passed by parliament-a. No religious criminal law at all. The profession has also become more regulated and there’s rules about the kind of education and degree you need to have and tests you need to pass to be a lawyer now. No more being a lawyer only because you’re born in the right family- you do have to compete with others even if on unfair terms.
This is very short legal history. Many overlaps and nuances cannot be explained in a comment. Go read some legal history.
Legacy judges like the Chandrachuds, Justice Khanwilkar, and Justice Mudholkar—Marathi speaking judges dominated the Bombay High Court for a long time, closely followed by Gujaratis. Similarly, Bengali speaking judges dominated the Northern Circuit. Over time, with Kolkata's colonial legacy, a distinct class of lawyers emerged, a phenomenon that also occurred in hubs like Bombay.
Today, I see a significant number of Marwaris in law firms, which I believe is a result of the rising cost of legal education, making it accessible only to the privilege
your entire comment is based on pure assumptions and anecdotes. You are cherry picking examples of branhmin judges to come to a preferred conclusion. Even in Kolkata, brahmin lawyers and judges were exceedingly rare considering 30-35% of bengali population would be brahmin. They have always preferred sciences, academia, IT as their area of focus.
https://www.deccanherald.com/amp/story/opinion/bjp-brings-caste-politics-to-bengal-881894.html
Diversity became a price to pay for progress , after the concept of nation states were invented
But Muslim representation is low relative to their numbers. Even there it is mostly the higher caste Muslims and not the pasmandas.