Read 21 comments as:
Filter By
That's not the point tho. Tier 1s hire very less people at the entry level. Tech on the other hand hires a lot of people.
One example to justify the sufferings of millions. Good job corporate stooge, here lick another shoe.
Iqbal khan last year made 12 cr post taxes and you are saying corporate lawyers earn less compared to tech people
If you think the engineering colleges are appalling, I won't argue with you
Science not requiring knowledge of history, ethics or philosophy?? Shows exactly how appalling the state of education (primary, secondary, further and higher) in our country is!
Brutal!! 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
No it means rw is uneducated about politics. That's why rw people are from backgrounds requiring zero knowledge of history, ethics or philosophy which is more 'real life' that making a robot arm move two degrees.
It implies unidirectional science teachings in the country. In Western countries, there is no such stupid ideological stereotyping among disciplines.
This. In the long run, successful lawyers age much better than tech bros both in terms of WLB and pay.
Why are hard sciences often rw while liberal arts lw? Does it imply lack of real life application of lw?
Or the work life attitude can be a coping mechanism.
In my experience, tech bros are unabashedly RW/centrist throughout college and work life. Law bros are woke in college but become RW/centrist in work life. I sometimes wonder if the wokeness of the latter in college is just a facade.
The difference is T1 law bros come close to tech bros in terms of any lifestyle or anything. T1 lawyers are less than 1% of all lawyers while tech bros top 10% of all engineers will outearn even T1 lawyers. That said lawyers are told to age better than tech bros.
For example, are both sets right wing? Are both sets misogynistic? Are both sets against affirmative action? Or are law bros a bit more liberal and humane, being products of a partly humanities education?

I'd be more interested in the Indian context.