We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Let’s be real: This case is the legal equivalent of trying to trademark the moon because you looked at it first. Here’s why IndiGo’s lawyers should’ve hit the brakes before filing this circus act:
1. Planes ≠ Cars: IndiGo flies people through the air. Mahindra makes electric vehicles. These are not remotely similar industries. No one is going to look at a Mahindra BE 6e and think, “Oh, is this what they’re replacing the Airbus with?”
2. Trademark ≠ Dictatorship: Yes, IndiGo has “6E” as a registered trademark for aviation. But trademarks are meant to prevent confusion in the same market—not grant companies a god complex over letters and numbers. The law doesn’t let you throw a tantrum every time someone dares to use the same characters.
3. Zero Confusion: Mahindra’s “BE 6e” is part of their “Born Electric” EV series. IndiGo’s “6E” is a flight call sign. The only way someone could mix them up is if they tried to board a Mahindra at the airport.
4. This Is Legal Overreach 101: If IndiGo wins this, where does it stop? Suing math teachers for putting “6” next to “E” in a textbook? Sending cease-and-desist letters to personalized license plates? Filing injunctions against people’s Wi-Fi passwords?
A Word of Caution to IndiGo’s Legal Eagles in Court:
This lawsuit doesn’t just defy logic—it makes you look ridiculous. By signing up to argue that “6E” is somehow sacred across all industries, you’re putting your professional credibility on a very public chopping block. Do you really want your career highlight to be the case where an airline tried to trademark two random characters in every context imaginable?
Every argument you make here is a double-edged sword, and it’s your credibility on the line. A trademark dispute is supposed to be grounded in substance, not in an overzealous corporate agenda. By asking the court to buy into this wild claim, you risk becoming the cautionary tale at every trademark seminar for years to come.
Do you really want your legacy to be “the lawyers who argued planes and cars are the same thing”? Because no matter the outcome, this case is already a punchline.
P.S.: If you’re this desperate for recognition, maybe sue Mahindra for their seating arrangement—it’s probably more spacious than indigo’s economy class.