Read 31 comments as:
Filter By
A 5-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
This must've changed recently. Or are you talking about OCs? Because earlier they couldn't participate in IUMCC.
Multiple people have spoken well even after being high, does that give MCA the parameter to be crap or great? Amazing logic Kerwa Senior!
Who are star mooters in 3rd year lol😂😂
A 22-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
A 139-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
These are first years, ofc they will have expectations. Saying that ‘no one cares for these events’ is a flawed logic kid, have some shame.
Well genius, here’s the reality check, even they are surprised. Only marking was in their hands, rest was upto your notorious core committee :)
Ask the fourth and fifth years regarding that, they were the judges, normalisation is a standard procedure that is applied uniformly.
Because they submitted the best memo and spoke better than other competitors.
Then why the best memorial award was given to the mca member, including the best speaker? Some talented people have been conveniently left out of the top 50 bandwidth due to horrible normalisation.
Freshers Pool se acche moots bhi nahi milte, itna kyu Rona hai lol
Sore losers cry really hard, do you think people in the MCA will pick and choose winners out of bias just because they are part of the society from what like 3 months. Nobody cares that much, Try to do better next year in the uni pools.
So how do they get selected to represent the university over others in outside tournaments?
A 10-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
NLUO has a strict policy prohibiting moot court members from participating in intra uni tournaments.
This is the case with GLC Mumbai as well. Here at GLC all winning teams are always from MCA. But the underperform in moots outside.
I can attest to this fact. Even the best speaker is also some MCA member