We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Argus Delhi A2?
The big companies go to them because of the name. Because they need to justify to the shareholders and BoD in case shit goes south and saying that we have a big firm on the matter lends credibility. But anything the T1s are able to offer, the boutiques will provide better.
But in terms of work, boutiques often have a more specialised team and know much more about the court they're knocking doors of. Specifically in white collar crimes-trials etc T1 can't catch up to the locals.
In arb, T1s tend to do better I think but work and performance is very subjective and depends so much team-to-team.
Can we have a comparison across firms, cities, and roles for the most prominent T1s, T2s and T3s? Litigators, please share the data.