We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Also I will advice moderators to be careful when baseless allegations of corruption are levelled against a state's judiciary.
Another candidate got 2 marks, some got 3,4,5. At the same time, people getting 19-20 too and not getting selected.
We can't put domicile angle, bcz people from the state itself are getting these marks.
How can somebody get a zero, the one who cleared Prelims. Like, they must have atleast attempted the paper.
Is this corruption? I thought atleast RJS is fair, compared to GJ and other states, but then....
Can someone tell, If it's just strict checking, or again harsh reality to be accepted.