Read 22 comments as:
Filter By
One or two instances have become "hundreds" suddenly? Anyway CAA only applies to people who entered before 2014, so it is unrelated to the present situation.
Yes. Because CAA need not have been made in a religiously discriminatory form in order to help such people.
I myself opposed CAA, but I sincerly apologize that I was wrong. Now I have understood everything.
If only these gullible idiots understood what was being protested in the first place - conferring / not conferring citizenship based on religion. When it comes to something as important as citizenship, our constitution doesn't permit such discrimination, as simple as that.
You yourself made it clear that the CAA discriminates on the basis of religion. Like it or not, our Constitution still makes this country a secular republic and hence our laws cannot do that.
They would not even remember it. Forgot about it as soon as the last wine tasting ended. Hypocrites function like that only.
So you are saying that in order to protest on a matter happening within my country when I'm a student, I've to give an undertaking that I'll join mainstream politics and contest elections at a later stage and become a career politician?
There's no need for preferential treatment. All of them can be accommodated even without any religious discrimination.
Why wasn't his application processed earlier exactly?
A 14-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
A 73-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.