Read 29 comments as:
Filter By
Which part of not having subjects you didn't understand
The question specifically asked to name all law subjects, not non-law ones! Which part of that doesn't make sense to you? You may have to go back and take a class called 'Reading 101', which you would really hate, I will bet.
The replies here clearly exhibit just how dumb lawyers are. No one likes technical subjects like corporate law, economics or tax. But everyone likes a snoozefest like sociology apparently. Pathetic.
Which part of the original comment did you not understand? Maybe something pretty 'technical' needs to be done to your brain!
Do real sociology for once. Your ass would not be able to read even a single primary source, much less engage with it.
Depends on the teacher really, how interesting they make it. I found Jurisprudence to be a better subject than Corp Law or Contracts. Not because of the study material, but the way the teacher taught it.
Law subjects: Family law. Labour law. Human rights.

BA subjects: Everything currently taught. IMO we need to replace BA subjects with BBA subjects throughout NLUs.
What about educational offerings for people who may not want to be corporate slaves all their lives?
You have aired this opinion over and over again here. You need to learn the difference between BA LLB and BBA LLB. There are NLUs where the latter is offered, people agreeing with your perspective can go study there.
This was a response specifically to the comment which said BA subjects should be 'replaced' by BBA subjects. FYI, I have no objection whatsoever to a system where BALLB and BBALLB are offered.
LM & Jurisprudence. Not against the subjects per se but can't understand the need of having both the papers. IMO any one of them will work.
A 5-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.