We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I recently received the following feedback on my manuscript submission:
"We regret to inform you that your manuscript has not been accepted by the Editorial Board. As per our assessment, the article is predominantly descriptive and its contribution to the existing literature is insufficient. Therefore, it has been rejected by the reviewers.
Iām struggling to understand how to improve my papers to meet the expectations of the editorial board. Any advice or resources on how to enhance the analytical depth and contribution of my research would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you in advance for your help.