Clat lists | Legally India

Read 17 comments as:

Filter By

byGuest

Yet it is such speculation that has led to almost every single CLAT reform in the past, as well as unearthing of the snafus and leakage in the past years for both CLAT and other competitive exams. Frankly, nobody cares about your CLAT rank so long as you have got into law school and if you have not, then they care even less.

...

byGuest

Tell me something. Say X has told people in confidence including myself after the exam that he has done really badly in the paper, but not knowing his roll number, I cannot check whether he has used some illegitimate means to secure a higher rank. Or even more commonly, something like the NEET controversy. People from same region or coaching centre end up securing top ranks. How exactly does the release of roll numbers help in identifying these by common people and testgivers? Unless it happens on a massive scale, it would never come out. Public release of roll numbers is almost as good as not releasing it at all, because those will only be useful in case of a formal investigation and the latter will never be demanded unless common stakeholders smell a rat that is rendered highly difficult by this practice.

...

byGuest

When the choice is between limited compromise of privacy and enabling illegality, the law usually chooses the former.

...

byGuest

THIS

...

byGuest

You clearly have no idea as an individual’s privacy should be maintained, so please stop talking

...

A 1-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.

...

byGuest

Roll numbers are still released, it's not completely opaque. This is a good balance between transparency and privacy.

...

byGuest

Probably to avoid unnecessary speculation by jobless people on the internet.

...

byGuest

This is factually accurate. Sudhir is the one who put this policy in place while heading the Consortium and he still vociferously argue in favour of that. The privacy excuse is laughable. If people are applying for a nation-wide exam, then what rank they have scored in such an exam should be made public at least to everyone else sitting for the exam.

...

byGuest

Because a formal inquiry has to be conducted in order for that to happen. However, names would have meant that people could have better figured out whether there is any prima facie reason why such an inquiry is to be demanded.

...

byGuest

2022 actually

...

byGuest

Roll numbers of the candidates are available which can be traced to the individual, in case of any inquiry. How is it a loss of transparency?

...

byGuesttrollish

Then Sudhir happened. He is the one in favour of max opacity.

...

byGuest

Toxicity relating to ranks

...

byGuest

Till 2020 CLAT used to give full merit list. Not putting out the list is risky and dangerous. Fraud, Admissions scandals can never be found out. Transparency goes to garbage. Seats can be given out to anyone in sketchy manner.

...

byGuest

Violation of privacy of the concerned individuals.

...

byGuest

Why did clat stopping giving the names of candidates against the merit list?

...