We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
But the SJA has been clearly hijacked or manipulated by a certain faction of the faculty. While it may have independently drafted the petition to the EC/CJI but the proverbial slip is clearly showing. The allegation is yet to be proved and the HC direction doesn't really concern the EC, which has been aware of the facts all along (irrespective of the fact whether it formally discussed those).
NKC hasn't exactly done wonders to NUJS but the powers that be are okay with his middling performance and want him around. Those powerful interests need to be shown that NKC is detrimental to their not-so-visible interests. And for that SJA really needs to rediscover its old self and steer clear for vested faculty and admin interests. This associate professor can fight her own battles.
There is still time. Wise up. Be clinical.