We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Most work, in this area, will be done by private universities. BML Munjal, Jindal and Sai University being prominent among them.
Like
Rafah and California
I like apar Gupta, Pranesh Prakash, Sunil Abraham, Amber Sinha, some of the folks working at Uber and meta in India are pretty sharp at this too.
Tech law-you dont have to work for a company, you could start an NGO, an independent consultancy, and do seriously good work outside academia while getting paid a good amount of money.
"There are still academics doing good work everywhere" is a nothing statement. The best people in this area are not usually found in a university space.
Private law- theory I said. Please read the comment properly. When we're talking about theories of private law- that sort of research is best done in universities, industry really has no space for it. Think of the work Nigam Nuggehalli or Akshaya Kamalnath or Shyam Balaganesh or Umakanth Varottil do- theres an academic and theoretical nature to their work that doesnt translate to an industry job.
you keep saying these nothing statements like "there are good people doing all kinds of law within and outside the university"- like okay then. have a nice day.
I dont think there are any meaningful collaborations that university professors in India are engaged in to be honest. These projects are hard to sustain and hard to succeed.
My perspective is that with tech law in particular, because there are plenty of opportunities in industry and in civil society organisations , because those jobs pay more and offer more flexibility and control than university jobs- the best scholars in that specific field are probably found outside of the university system. I gave examples of those names.
Stop being so defensive- if youre offended no one thought of you/ your professor when suggesting names- perhaps you should work harder or your professor should do more impactful work. I'm done with this conversation now.
That you feel the need to discredit instead of just disagreeing indicates some deeper pathology at play.
Consider that if your work is not being mentioned or whoever you are shilling for is not being mentioned - it might be because the work is not making impact. Every nlu has ten centres and most of the time they donβt do one single impactful or valuable thing the entire time they exist. Just because thereβs someone who claims they do tech law or have a centre with no projects and either no publications or publications that arenβt read by anyone - doesnβt mean theyβre being ignored because of some bias or animus or even ignorance- the work might just not be as interesting or impactful.
If this question was asked about criminal law - everyone would mention Anup and Mrinal and Aparna and all of them wouldnβt they ? Itβs because their work makes impact. I donβt think thereβs one person in tech law space in the universities who has similarly undeniable impact.
Iβm absolutely done with this now. I feel like Iβm talking to a wall. If youβre working on this stuff and feel resentful at lack of recognition - work harder, go to therapy, touch grass.
The reason I mentioned these names ie because they started/headed organisations in the space and they write prolifically so anyone wanting to read indian lawyers in tech law should start reading here.
Theres obviously a sex disparity- but I dont think getting angry at us will do you much good. You need to get angry at people twenty years ago who gate kept tech law, or at women twenty years ago who chose not to pursue it because it was too niche.