We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
The inquiry committee report is embarrassing for the HC - the bench should have apologized to the university and the chancellor for making a mountain out of a molehill and making it harder for genuine victims to come forward with claims in the future.
Registrar has become the fall guy. He couldn't have acted alone in this entire fiasco. But AG is in a fire-fighting mode and the HC can do little if the inquiry report "found nothing" directly concerning the two issues that were highlighted in the media.
Very interestingly, the ex-SC judges (the one who recused and the other who took her place) were art of the inquiry committee that took up the SH complaint against CJI Gogoi; and that too "found nothing"!
GNLU was becoming Tier 1?