We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
- Higher income tax slabs
- Further 20% wealth tax on top of income tax on super rich like Adani, Ambani, Jindal etc
-Higher taxes on products for the rich, like SUVs, iPhones etc
- Inheritance tax. When passing on your house to children the children should pay a tax on it.
All these measures are constitutional. These measures alone can raise up to 10 lakh crores per year at least. Then Rs 10 lakh can be distributed to 1 crore poor families from SC/ST/OBC/Muslim communities every year.
What do you think?
https://twitter.com/harsht2024/status/1782768302873272798.
She says that a survey will be carried out to see how much each caste earns. Then wealth be distributed to those at the bottom, to SC/ST/OBC communities. Practically speaking, I think that the caste that will probably finish on top is the Vaishya/Baniya caste, because families like Ambani, Adani, Jindal etc own a large chunk of India's wealth. Then I guess the Brahmins and Kshatriyas, who are engaged in white collar professions. Now, if you take 30% of Vaishya wealth and maybe 20% of Brahmin/Kshatriya wealth and distribute it to the SC/ST/OBC communities, the inequality gap will be substantially reduced --- not just financial inequality but also social and educational inequality, because the SC/ST/OBC communities can use their new wealth to send their children to good schools and universities. The long term impact will be that India's GDP will be qualitatively superior, not just quantitatively superior. Thus, we will be able to compete with China better, because our current economic situation is lopsided, where only a few castes can benefit from the opportunities given by globalisation.
Amartya Sen has explained this very well, He says that China and India were similarly placed at one time, but the reason China grew faster is because their social base was more equal.
Hence, this is an excellent policy that deserves our support.