We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Welcome to India! where mediocrity is rewarded, and ambition and competence are punished. No wonder there was so much controversy around Sanjeev Sanyal's comment.
Some comments on the thread below. My first thought is that if these are the type of questions asked in the UPSC, then surely NLU grads have a chance of doing very well? Maybe it's time more NLU grads think of giving this exam, even at the cost of 2 years prep?
"Kids, the only thing that matters is good handwriting."
(from NLSIU alum and corp lawyer Suhas Baliga)
"This is so worthless. Dumping Oppenheimer story in basic english - verbose & pointless. Our priorities seem skewed when we test outdated skills in exams instead of nurturing critical thinkers and innovators. We urgently need to reassess this exam and the candidates."
"Good but it seems written by a 10th grader rather than the UPSC CSE AIR 1. Grammatical mistakes and lack of connection between the lines described make this a doubtful essay."
"bro waffled his way to ias"
"UPSC also you have to underline keywords like in board exam?"
This is so worthless. Dumping Oppenheimer story in basic english - verbose & pointless. Our priorities seem skewed when we test outdated skills in exams instead of nurturing critical thinkers and innovators. We urgently need to reassess this exam and the candidates.