We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I dont remember nestle saying they cured corona or cancer, patanjali did, so stop being a Patanjali apologist
Why don't you stick to writing unsolicited emails asking for assessment internships that bear no fruit instead of spewing this garbage here.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/supreme-court-revives-governments-case-in-ncdrc-against-nestle-india/articleshow/67363701.cms
I saw another post today where someone compared Australians Kit Kat with Indians Kit Kat. The Aussie Kit Kat has 1/4 coco, while the Indian Kit Kat has very little cocoa and is packed with sugar instead. I have had foreign Kit Kat and you can clearly tell the difference.
"We would like to assure you that our Infant Cereal products, are manufactured to ensure the appropriate delivery of nutritional requirements such as Protein, Carbohydrates, Vitamins, Minerals, Iron etc. for early childhood. We never compromise and will never compromise on the nutritional quality of our products. We constantly leverage our extensive Global Research and Development network to enhance the nutritional profile of our products."
https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1780888103554568681
Under this regulations, reference is made to the term "traditional food". The same is defined under regulation 2(c) as
"“Food for infants based on traditional food ingredients” are products known to
be prepared traditionally at home for feeding infants, but processed and provided in
packaged forms, after six months up to twenty-four months of age".
Now any baby food that is marketed by any company, is prescribed after 6 months of the baby's birth.
What is important to note is that certain ingredients have been included into the defination by virtue of regulation 11.
By looking at the said regulations namely R.11(1) read with R.2(c), we get a clear picture as to what is traditional food and what does it constitute.
At this juncture, it is fruitful to observe Regulation 11(4) that stipulates a non-exhaustive list of the following ingredients
"(4) Explanatory note: A non-exhaustive examples of foods for infants based on
traditional foods are:
(a) Cooked lentils, cereals, dry fruits, grains mashed to a pasty form, sweetened
with sugar or jaggery or honey ;
(b) Cooked vegetables mashed to a pasty form either sweetened or with little ghee;
(c) Ragi malt mix;
(d) Semolina or sooji based foods with either milk or curd or ghee".
Hence, not only does the it means that the ingredient in question is not only complient with regulatory norms but also is within the confines of traditional food adopted by the subcontinent.
Ps not from Nestle or anything, just have interest in food sciences.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/nestle-adds-sugar-to-baby-cereal-sold-in-india-study-finds-5466244#pfrom=home-ndtv_topscroll