We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Kinda like what happens in the UK, US, Australia
Moving forward BA-LLB (H) will have to be phased out. The PIL also shows how regressive the current thinking in the NLUs is. NLS increases its intake for the BA-LLB (H) program. It could not even come up with something more innovative and futuristic. Needless to mention, those with a humanities background in Class 12 have a vested interest in favoring BA-LLB (H), but the trend is moving away from it.
- Those lawyers will be so immature to understand law, there is a purpose behind 5 year law, even if Jurisprudence is directly of no use but it gives you a maturity to understand law from various perspectives.
- What do you mean that BA has nothing to do with legal practice, not everybody wants to go for corporate or practice or core legal field, people may be want to try civil services or social Sciences. BALLB as a whole give you that liberty to explore in those 5 years.
- 3 year is a very less time to understand law, because it's too vast, it's not even doable in 5 years even. 3 yr is just.....
- Infact 3 year LLB should be scrapped instead.
(Btw, I can see what's gonna happen, this petition is going to be dismissed and costs would be charged, best thing)
Ours is still less duration in terms of academic years (usually 5 years integrated or 3+3) in comparison with US (4+3)
I agree 100%. This can easily be done by:
- Scrapping the BA humanities courses. They have zero relevance to legal practice and have been reduced to a woke echo chamber filled with biased literature
- Reduce fam law to 1 course instead of 2 (fam law will anyway become 1 course when the UCC comes into effect)
- Scrap jurisprudence. Again, no relevance to legal practice
- Make labour, IP, human rights and private international law electives.