We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
the names you mentioned or people who are doing litigations after llm come from privileged background
i know some will mention a couple of names who are not from that background, but they are exceptions
if your family can afford the money then do the llm but it will be of little use unless you come from that strata of the society
I do not have very good grade, from a maybe tier 2 college (pvt). 7.4/10
If I get clerkship opportunity, which universities (UK US) can I possibly get in, with such grades?
More importantly, how much would an LLM matter for litigation with the changing landscape.
Honestly, though, has the landscape even changed?
Most of these “super senior”, the famous ones, have had their degrees from abroad. Be it Sibal, Singhvi, or whoever else. And of much before them, all the founding members of India who were lawyer ofc, although out of necessity i guess