We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
CAM : 6 ppos
KCO: 8 and 2 are scheduled
Saraf: 5 PPos and 2 in pipeline
Trilegal: 2 ppos
S&R: 1 (they came back finally)
Luthra: 2
The 5th year RPC would want to deny this rn but we have reached 24 and 4 more to go. NLS doesn't have jobs or ice packs for that matter
But here are the real figures
CAM- 7
AZB-3
Trilegal- 3
Saraf - 2
Lined up- 5 CAM 3Saraf
CAM- 2 ▮▮▮ ▮▮▮
Kco- 1 ▮▮▮
Trilegal-1 ▮▮▮
Saraf - 2 ▮▮▮ ▮▮▮
Source- I legit have friends in RPC.
We write this to the moderators here on an urgent basis. We would like to point that PPOs, job offers, vac schemes , training contracts and other associated details with it are sensitive and confidential in nature.
We do understand that this information is common knowledge amongst the batch however, in the larger interest of the candidate receiving this offer and the batch in general. Please refrain from revealing details.
The CRC traditionally reveals numbers and figures post Day Z and we will do that however, in the meantime kindly do not reveal confidential and personal information both for the sake of candidates and the batch at large.
Further, we cannot or will not be able to trace whoever decides platforms like Legally India are ok for such information. But they are not.
Revealing names and forms of people who have received their PPO is totally and utterly unacceptable and unwarranted. It does not benefit any of us and may have serious future impacts.
We are presenting this as a request. However, note if we come to know of any person engaging in revealing confidential information publicly. We will take the maximum possible action available to us to hold that person accountable.
Wishing that the batch notes their interest and those of their friends .
to my knowledge,
(4) CAM
(6) Khaitan
(1) Trilegal
(1) (interviewed)