We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Trying to cancel someone for a view they expressed in a classroom is just gross authoritarianism. Especially when theyre a young professor trying to do their jobs and you are fairly certain in your position because youve bought your way into a university and you know you have admin on your side.
I bet JGLS students wouldnt like it if professors started videoing all the stupid nonsense they say and putting it up online. It would end hundreds of careers at once. Of course professors dont do this because they understand that students are young and growing and need to have the grace humans need for making mistakes and saying stupid things to be proven wrong, they understand that universities cannot function if we were to call down the mob on every student who states an errant thought- the whole point of universities is to make mistakes and learn. It shows the small mindedness of jgls students that they dont reciprocate that same grace and generosity to their professors.
Your social media feed is curated to show the best version of you. How would you really like it if you had to go into work everyday knowing you could be recorded at any time and that would be used to judge you as a human being?
How little have you thought about this that you would make that comment?
1. Most faculty do PR including sharing the content prepared by the PR team. They do similar PR by approaching foreign scholars and recommending their names for global ranking survey purposes.
2. Your maths skills need work, especially addition. In any case, 10% best proven how? Using what metric? 60% good? Any faculty would contest that. I have taken classes there and the reality is far from what you claim. Only a handful of students display any regular and consistent desire to learn. Maybe 10% of any class.
3. Really? Most of the debarred candidates ended up giving exams after admin intervention. That's an open secret. Any disciplinary action taken against influential students result into the faculty being pressurised by the admin to reconsider. Phonecalls start coming from 'influential' sources. Students collude to give bad feedback against faculty who try to impose discipline. Teachers are recorded in class without their consent and certain clips leaked without context on social media. People's increments and appraisal get affected.
4. Not when admin gets to decide faculty's appraisal, promotion, salary scale and even the job security. Case in point, Raj's immediate censorship of the faculty email about salary disparity.
60% class in JGLS good quality students. 10% are the best in the country. compare with any law school. Why focus on bottom 20%.
Students fail courses. 500+ students were debarred on attendance grounds sometime back. There is zero interference with faculty decisions. You can always take all possible actions to improve academic standards. Nobody stops you.
Faculty is above the admin. Why will you obey them?
there is a widespread sense that increments are given to admin folks because theyre in the good graces of the administration even though they do fairly little work in terms of class prep or in terms of evaluation and student facing work. These decisions are never justified or transparent- they dont even explain to you why someone got a raise and someone didnt. Last year i heard of several people who actually had their salary amount changed in the salary adjustment email to less than what was agreed upon at the time of joining. The university might be paying more than some other universities- but it is no longer true that its the best paymaster for legal academics in india.
Faculty welfare and support is not really a priority at all for the university. and if you try to enforce rigor and have standards in your education you will be at the mercy of a student mob and an admin that dances to their tunes. the way administrators see this is -faculty take out salaries from university corpus
Lmao for what joy
This is not way the discussions relating to compensation can be undertaken. Please stop sending mass emails to the entire JGU community. If you have specific grievance relating to your compensation, please send an email to HR and that will be examined as per the university procedures and processes.
I request you to immediately STOP sending such mass emails to all faculty regarding individual compensation. These are not only matters of confidentiality but also based upon elaborate procedures and processes that were followed in a transparent manner. Notwithstanding that, if there are grievances on account of compensation, you should address them specifically to the HR.
Thanks for your understanding.
Best regards
We live in an age where the democratisation of decision-making through digital tools is a reality. While I echo our VC and Dean Sudarshan’s coverage of the appraisal process, I wish to understand if that is also the common feeling amongst the rest of us colleagues. I am trying to understand the perception we hold of this process which isreflected in our compensation package. Let me explain what I am trying to find out through an example: I am a lawyer with particular years of experience. When I look at my compensation package from JGU, I feel that while it had matched the industry standard at the time of joining, it does not do so anymore. This has left me distraught. (This example is intentionally kept short to underline the brevity that is required in emails that solicit responses but please do use as many words to explain your reasons for agreement or disagreement with the compensation package.)
A few things to note:
1. It is an anonymous survey. Your email id is required only for login. Your answers will not be referenced to your name or email ids.
2. Please mention your correct designation.
3. Please write detailed reasons.
4. Please do NOT mention your compensation package anywhere. In fact, do not use numbers (or digits) to express any amounts anywhere in the form. This rule is specifically formulated so that we do not violate JGU HR policy.
You cannot take disciplinary actions against any student for improving standards.
You have to resign to the fact that more than half of the batch will be apathetic towards learning in general and law in particular.
You will have to shamelessly do PR for the University.
Jindal is one of the best faculty employers in India.
Positive
Good salary, higher than UGC pay scale.
Minimum teaching hours (8 hours per week)
Ample time and funding.for research, travel grants etc better than any private uni in the country
Housing, transport, food on campus, health center, sports, other facilities.
No unnecessary attendance rules - punch in,.punch out like most private universities
Disadvantages
Location is rural Haryana. Sonipat small town nearby. Delhi is away.
If having school going kids, no top class schools in Sonipat like Delhi or Noida/Gurgaon.
If aged parents, no Max, Apollo or high quality hospital in the city.
Rest all fine.
The rumours about faculty departures and zero increments have left me with some questions about the current state of affairs at Jindal. As someone who's eager to contribute to and grow within the academic community, it's important to me to understand the university's stance on faculty welfare and support. Any leads?