We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
With regulatory work, you may be straddling advisory and disputes, but typically in one industry / sector, and often you will do advisory work and some BAU documentation.
So, someone who works in insurance, will know the regulations which impact policies but someone doing insurance M&A should immediately know how insurance M&As are structured.
Someone who does Fintech work, should know how payment aggregator or gateway documentation works or how PPI instruments work or how some of the newer RBI's fintech guidelines and limitations will impact the sector. But someone who does transactions work doesn't need to know any of this until there is a deal and then they will work during the deal to get an overview of it while undertaking due diligence. The firm advising the company or exiting shareholder won't even know this unless some issue is flagged for discussion.
Switch to transaction side.