Posting this here because human rights people like to dump on India and we see this echoed among law students. Yet they don’t reserve the same criticism for Pakistan. Also, Malala may be a Nobel Peace Prize owner and Greta may succeed her one day, but their posturing is one-sided.
Why would an Indian criticise the violation of human rights the same way they would do so in India? Are they practising law in Pakistan? Should they have equally high expectation of that military dictatorship as they do of their own democratically elected government?
Atleast they didn't convert, reconvert and then convert again. Someone who can't even speak kashmiri properly, never lived in Kashmir and claims to be kashmiri. I agree with Kashmir being India's but not this stooge being kashmiri
Posting this here because human rights people like to dump on India and we see this echoed among law students. Yet they don’t reserve the same criticism for Pakistan. Also, Malala may be a Nobel Peace Prize owner and Greta may succeed her one day, but their posturing is one-sided.