Read 18 comments as:
Filter By
Have frequently read here that it is ridiculous for students or faculty at JGLS to be leftist/left-leaning owing to its industrialist and capitalist founding Chancellor. This is, truly, a pea-brained, narrow minded argument that seems to suggest educational/academic spaces and institutions should not - for fear of being hypocritical - create space for a full spectrum of ideological thought. Please note that some of the best academic institutions in the world, including Stanford, Carnegie Mellon and Cornell are private unis that came into existence through donations and endowments of their founders who comprised America's most powerful businessmen including the notorious American railroad and steel industry magnates. Also note that the founding members of several Ivies including Harvard and also non Ivies were slave-owners who endorsed the slave trade. Does this take away from the contributions these institutions have made and continue to make to education, academia, innovation? Does it automatically render leftist thought that stems from these universities? I think not. Hope this post is educational to some of you and shuts down the idiots sprouting bs about how JGLS should not have leftists. Open your minds to the future of education in this country
The fact that you call this criticism "pea brained" and seem to think that the predominant leftist thought in america comes from ivys and stanford and carnegie mellon shows me how little curiosity and education you have.

What youre not seeing, and what students at JGLS and Ivys are not seeing. is that there is a wide chasm between the identity driven ideological performance of elite college credentialed ( wouldnt call them educated) wealthy people and the concerns of the daily worker and farmer and the average aam aadmi. The left could be a broad tent that includes all types. but the elite college credentialled are sucking all the air out of the room because of their desperate need for attention and are in fact harming poor people by furthering activism that comes from obscure academic arguments rather than material concerns of poor people. Look at this website this week- do we even care why farmers are protesting? or are we all just here to gossip about students and proctors and play teams?

Thats why people call you out on your own hypocricy. Im an old school socialist and I would anyday prefer the naked lack of concern of the right wing toward the poor than this faux concern thats really all about self promotion from the elite left. FWIW- the indian left doesnt want you or need you. You have nothing to offer it until you get a smidge of common sense and humility and a morality that goes beyond group think.

Lets pick apart a few things JGLS lefties have done recently to show you how none of this is important from a left wing perspective- only an identitarian one. And then lets consider what students at elite colleges could do if they really gave a **** about poor people.

This latest scandal- ram temple. The problem behind the ram temple is not the ram temple. Literally no ones lives got worse because they inaugurated a temple we all knew they were going to build. The problem behind the temple were the riots and violence that preceded the rath yatra in the 90's. Many of those people still havent gotten any justice at all and I doubt anyone at JGLS could name even one of those cases. The problem behind the ram temple is that its being propogated as an economic solution to the problem of poverty and no body is concerned about whether this is a solution, any kind of solution, or even the best solution to address unemployment and poverty. The problem behind the ram temple is that this issue has for too long taken up all the air time leaving little enough room to discuss farmer suicides and medical scams and a hundred other real things that plague the country. The elite left is obsessed with this because they like to know theyre more tolerant of muslims than the right.The problem of course is that average everyday muslims shouldnt have to choose between someone who views them as an easily mollified identitarian vote bank or someone who is out to define them out of the union. they should have lawmakers and activists who are looking out for their interests in jobs, education, discrimination at work or in renting a house. We've all known the Sacchar committee results for a while- What has the elite left done to propose solutions to that problem? do they even have a coherent understanding of why muslims are left behind in Indian society? no. they do not. The muslims religion is the only bit they care about- not the hunger in his belly nor the fact that his daughter cannot go to college or that his son cannot get a job or that his wife will not inherit property fairly.

A materialist politics would not prioritise the ram temple over all the other things that are happening in this country.

Before Ram temple there was palestine. Please explain to me exactly what a war in the middle east has to do with the material conditions of poor people in india? why should they give a crap? this is entirely a woke obsession thats only present at universities. Regular people do not care. they are not stuck to their phones looking at insta reels all day consuming propaganda about decolonisation (ridiculous academese for rape and murder) theyre working or trying to get work. they care about jobs, health care, education, opportunity, not having your air or water poisoned by a big company and being able to work with reasonable terms. thats it. this is a solely elite obsession. What material change happened because students at jgls had a protest and invited some silly speaker and got that professor cancelled? Did the war stop? did anyone who can do anything about the war take into account jgls students feelings? did anyone who can do anything about indias position do anything differently because of idiots in sonipat? no. so why is this issue more important for jgls students than the inhumane way some campus workers are treated on campus? Why is this issue more important than food service workers who have been seen eating out of the trash because theyre hungry? what is wrong with you guys that you think this kind of posturing makes you more moral?

What else did JGLS do- the modi documentary. I dont like censorship, I went to the screening. But at least I was aware that we were cosplaying as revolutionaries that day with little enough risk to our own well being. We didnt save the damn constitution, we just wasted precious capital playing cops and robbers on campus instead of advocating for cleaning up biswamil which is submerged in crap half of the year. Which we, without hesitation name our college festival after. This is disgusting. If youre only fighting right wing jerks on campus- youre not really fighting injustice or poverty. Youre just acting out some teenage fantasy.

Even the people who are revered on campus for their scholarship- their work is all ass backwards. One famous centre head worried to me how she doesnt want to upset a trans rights activist and wants to be a good ally. Well that trans rights activist wanted school teachers to give poor children puberty blockers and abolish same sex bathrooms in schools. Not private schools- government schools- thats in the NCERT guidance that he wrote. Why is JGLS more interested in fawning over this dude than protecting vulnerable children? if poor female kids dont have a female only bathroom they dont get sent to school. Why are the gender folks not daring to say anything about it at all?

Another womens rights centre is so obsessed with their own petty politics and ego games, the best thing they could do all last year was give diversity advice to a company, pad their resumes and that of their friends by hosting a conference and - iirc- an art competition? what are you high? these are the same people who will argue sex work is work and gloss over the dehumanisation inherent in that job or how truly helpless someone must be to do something like that to their own body. Elite college liberals who have done nothing at all to actually help women.

Oh and then theres that famous prof who writes about violence and the law and these navel gazing pieces about his own positionality when he works at jindal but hosts conferences on labour while jindal steel commits crimes against its workers. What tangible gain has anyone gotten out of his scholarship that elite self obsession and academese? Why is that guy a hero?

Sorry to say at least ivys had practitioner law professors like Catherine Mackinnon and Martha Minnow or even RBG in her day that actually moved the needle on important issues. Yall dont produce great scholarship, and neither do you actually do politics thats impactful. Have a little humility.

The thing leftist students at jindal should be doing if they really take their leftism seriously- is set up a legal services clinic that actually works for poor people in sonipat. actually put in days and nights trying to solve peoples problems instead of these meaningless protests. The protests all have the same stupid formula anyway and we're all tired of it. These safdar hashmi people will plan some theatrical protest that makes them feel morally virtuous, the right wing jerks will come and video and disrupt , they will send that crap to op india and organiser, the admin will behave like theyre amoral spineless yes men. and a few weeks will pass until it all repeats. What are any of you getting out of this? get a reality check. Stop confusing your privilege in caring about these virtue signalling issues with morality and try to actually make someones life a little better. Be nice to the driver uncle who has to carry a million little things to the gate cause princess cant hurt her nail. Show a modicum of respect to guard on campus who are hired to do a job to keep you safe. Try and protect academic standards and dont throw a fit over a bad grade. Try and learn the law. be a good student and maybe youll be a good person.

The future of the american or the indian left is not elite professors in law universities and their students. Not if they remain ignorant of the concerns of the poor. Even Baxi and other law professors were fairly elite- but at least they did something- their best- to move the needle on real issues. The future of the country is in freaking medical schools and engineering colleges and government universities like JNU where people do actual work that has actual impact. Save a life, build a bridge, figure out how to fix the economy. If you want to be included in that project of actually building a better country- you will have to- turn the phone off- shut up and learn to listen to people who actually need help. Spend your life in service of something other than your own image.
Youโ€™ve completely missed the point of this post. I actually agree with most of your observations about wokeness and performativity whether at JGLS or other elite institutions (including NLUs which are in fact extremely elitist in a very different but very real way). This post was directed at a very different set of criticisms than what you have set out here. I.e., the claim that because of who Navin Jindal is, and because JGLS is a school for the upper middle class / rich - they should not be engaging in leftist politics at all. That is what is pea-brained. Now, the definition and meaning and quality of what โ€œleftist politicsโ€ is and what it ought to be is, of course, open to criticism and I welcome your criticism on that front. What you are saying applies not only to Jindal but most universities everywhere in the world. In fact it applies to most people everywhere in the world. In the US we think itโ€™s only the republicans that want to maintain status quo and are against poverty alleviation schemes and racial uplliftment but the truth is democrats are equally so except in more veiled ways. Most elites / upper middle class everywhere in the world do not ACTUALLY want anything to change vis-a-vis the existence of poverty because that would come at a cost to THEMSELVES. Yes there is performative politics at JGLS as there is everywhere. It id still a starting point. Itโ€™s still important to have that space for thought. And frankly, you are essentialising the work that students at jgls do. And also the students themselves. Yes there are bad apples but not everyone is the disrespectful, obnoxious and ignorant prick you are trying to make them out to be. there are many students at Jindal who are doing a LOT more than you think, including the very things youโ€™ve mentioned here i.e advocating for Sodexo worker rights, providing legal, monetary aid to workers on campus and outside of it, working with children in communities surrounding the university, raising money for people whose homes were burnt down by mobs. There IS a legal aid clinic. And you know why? Because of education. These things CAN and do exist alongside the protests and discussions you find so meaningless. A lot of the real action that happens in the world is the product of education (whatever source it may come from - parents, teachers, friends) and SPACE for thought. Itโ€™s interconnected, not everyone can fit your perfect ideal of what politics should look like. Education is what produces change and builds countries. Education produces better human beings. I mean, seriously, build a fucking bridge? You may as well have said, beta just study engineering or medicine because nothing else is real or matters. And maybe next time go figure the actual point of a post and what it addresses before you unleash all that misdirected cynicism and resentment.
So all your bitterness basically boils down to the fact that the rich and undeserving JGLS kids are getting attention. damn.
It boils down to rich undeserving kids are sucking up all the air in the room playing culture wars while poor peoples problems get little enough attention yes. Itโ€™s not because Iโ€™m not getting attention . I donโ€™t need it or want it personally. It boils down to the left being forced to prioritise the issues of the elite intelligentsia rather than the working class.
poor peopleโ€™s problems getting little attention is unfortunately the reality of everywhere in this country and the world. Your insistence that itโ€™s only jgls betrays your prejudice (or delusion). And you contradict yourself; according to you jgls kids are irrelevant to the left, so surely they cannot be the reason the latter is โ€œbeing forced to prioritise the issues of the elite intelligentsiaโ€
No, I am not dense, I am actually trying to engage with what you have said despite the fact that it is irrelevant to my original post, i.e., that arguments attacking jgls politics SOLELY based on the identity of the chancellor, or the background of its students, are not valid. You may have an issue with the politics itself taking place at jgls (and 99% of cases involving elite academic institutions - that is not whataboutery but the literal truth) and if you actually read my responses you would see that I agreed with your criticisms about the performativity in these circles. I guess your nlu/male-driven superiority complex won't let you admit that your points are irrelevant so keep at it with your tirades like a broken record, i'm out - my original message stands, loud and clear, to everyone reading it!!!
What im saying is that criticisms that you think come from "identity" or "background". are criticisms about class and materialist politics. Youre choosing not to consider the best argument of your critic and only respond to the worst version of it.

99% of elite academic institutions? where did you pull that nonsense from? I clearly explained how students and faculty at other law schools here and abroad avoid the trap of empty performativity that you guys dont. Im neither male nor from an NLU- you again choose to disregard what I have to say because of presumed identity- not a very marxist thing to do. an identitarian woke thing to do.

that last sentence is the online version of a kid sticking fingers in his ears and shouting "nah uh i win i win i win !"
How is this not marked trollish? What kind of an insensitive partisanal mod is this? If I dare say the same thing but use the term 'female' instead of 'male', I would love to see how quickly that comment is marked trollish and even perhaps not published at all.
I agree about performative wokenes and being out of touch with the poor. But the biggest criticism is the sheer hypocrisy. These people join monopolistic law firms advising monopolistic and corrupt companies, furthering the worst of crony capitalism in India. It shows they are not serious or sincere.
The long comment by the 'old school socialist' is one of the best things I've read in a long time. Please start a blog and post the link here