Tell me you do not know TWAIL without telling me you do not know TWAIL. TWAIL was not pro USSR but USSR was pro TWAIL because it was always an excellent opportunity for them to embarrass the West. That is why the USSR was always been pro-Global South at the UN when voting on resolutions and like, which many times have nothing to do with TWAIL or any other theory for that matter.
I am not talking about the authors but the school. The others don't need publication but the school of TWAIL needs publicity. Especially since it's the only school from the global south. Which is been given an issue only as a 'charity work' by EJIL. This is because the AJIL had refused to make TWAIL as the main focus of their issue, when talked about. There's a tussle between AJIL & EJIL, & this is just backstage politics going on to make their journals more credible than the other. There's a larger difference between the US & EU when it comes to how the future of IL should be governed, and the pity publication is to get more scholars on their side. Therefore the journals are have a pity party here. You naive little child, you need to grow up & see that not everything deserves credit just for being given the spotlight. Jab kuch pata nahi toh bolte nahi.
How significant is a research in TWAIL in the present moment ? Will it be outdated in a couple of years ? Can someone tell me the current generation of TWAIL scholars ?
The other issue link is here: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/ajil-unbound-by-symposium/twail-perspectives-on-icl-ihl-and-intervention
Source: humble Google search from a poor and 'naive little child'
Source - people who work in both journals.
And you talk about TWAIL
At best it will get you an university job if you can show you are intersectional ;)
EJIL is as mainstream as it gets, which has now said that TWAIL has become mainstream.