Read 10 comments as:
thread
newest first
Filter By
Featured
x
I am at that juncture of life where I can deep dive into law or move away from it. I have experienced law firm culture and would not like to work in a law firm. Given that litigation does not pay well, that is also something I don't want to do. People who are first-generation lawyers and are deliberating on what choice to make please advice.
+1 -0
...
reply Sorry to be brutal but this is a silly comparison. Both fields are different - i would suggest that you go with whatever is your "calling" - there is no right/wrong choice objectively speaking. Examine what you would like more - working in courtrooms, adjudicating matters, being in a service that has excellent repute but limited pay, vs. a private job with greater monetary benefits and working with/in companies? like i said, it has to be a personal choice. Both CAT and judiciary exams require considerable studying and hardwork, and i do not think you can do both. Follow your gut instinct, whatever is your calling is what you will do better in.
+4 -1
...
reply Bump plz
+0 -0
...
reply MBA. At this point you shouldn't even ask this question. An MBA if done from the top 5 colleges will give you more opportunities than law related careers.
+6 -3
...
reply Different people want different things ("opportunities") in life???
+2 -0
...
reply Bump
+0 -0
...
reply Bumpp
+0 -0
...
reply Judiciary is a job whereas MBA is a subject course. How both can be compared? Pdhna hai too MBA karlo or naukri socha tha judiciary pprtn krlo
+3 -0
...
reply Judiciary gives decent money but if you want to be UMC with good career progression then choose MBA( only from top few colleges).
+0 -0
...
reply LLM kar le
+0 -1
...
reply