We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Was never really a judicial aspirant nor had any prior preparation, mostly spent time in litigation internships, just had the recent case laws upto my sleeves.
Exam ain't that tough.
Most of the questions reproduce the provision and test how you apply it or what you understand from it, rather than mugging up.
Keepa good hold over latest case laws. I remember many judiciary aspirants also attempting the paper with me (around 40-50 people) good chunk of them did not even cleared the cut-off, so dont brow-beat yourself into thinking that you dont stand a chance.