We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
While you and I can have different experiences, from my experience, their work product have been consistently above-average. Their ability to gain marquee deals is a function of lot of things in addition to the quality of work product. Given its a big team, its also possible that the work quality varies greatly.
Anyways, you do you.
Also, the people are very easy to work. One of the best teams
With regards to work, they have a good quantity of work which is a quality mix of both enforcement and merger control. But they largely pigeon hole resources into a specific type of work. This affects overall growth of the resource.
The money is very good in this team.
Based on my limited experience, the quality of work is largely above average in this team.