Jindal does not have any such reputation. The alumni make or break a university, nothing else. Jindal has not produced such people in sizable numbers even after 15 years.
1. Faculty: Not really. Other than a few marquee names, most Jindal faculty are inexperienced and lacking credible publications or research background.
2. Infra and facilities are unsatisfactory given the atrocious fees. Better than that of NLUs, but those places charge a lot less.
3. None of those exposures has really been sustainably used unless you have extra cash to spare after the high fees. There's no 'global exposure' that's part of the regular university experience. Guest lectures by foreign scholars happen at other places too.
Infra is on the decline, not much exposure unless you can spend a lot more to go abroad, most of the faculty are too junior to know anything themselves.
if you have the money then go for jindal- good faculty, good infrastructure, really good exposure. although the rate at which the VC is expanding jindal seems a little questionable, if you have your eyes set on the right things then jindal will help you get them
do jindal have better reputation and brand value than sls or it's other way around? I couldn't clear clat so now I'm confuse which one will be more good in terms of placements etc in long run
1. Faculty: Not really. Other than a few marquee names, most Jindal faculty are inexperienced and lacking credible publications or research background.
2. Infra and facilities are unsatisfactory given the atrocious fees. Better than that of NLUs, but those places charge a lot less.
3. None of those exposures has really been sustainably used unless you have extra cash to spare after the high fees. There's no 'global exposure' that's part of the regular university experience. Guest lectures by foreign scholars happen at other places too.
Reasons
1. Faculty - jindal is far better
2. Infra/ food/ facilities - jindal probably best in country
3. Global exposure, exchange programs, double degree etç.