We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
It is no secret that most of their Core Committee members did not attend classes, a fact that anybody in GNLU can confirm. It is heard that there was complaint from a sitting Supreme Court justice specifically on this issue that led to tightened norms for attendance, leading to backlogs for most SAC Core members.
Now it is unclear whether Pentagram will take place or not, and it is unlikely that a solution will be found by the Administration to host Pentagram.
This remains a unique case of the whole core committee resigning in the history of GNLU. The pressure from the admin could be attributed to multiple reasons, including rising discontent among faculty for SAC floating basic attendance and other rules, cases of misappropriation of funds and ragging by SAC core members and not to forget serious allegations of ragging and supply of intoxicants by the SAC Convenor himself.
It is expected that the Admin takes a strict stand without causing jeopardy to the student community as a whole. Only time will tell...
I am sorry to say this, but I feel that OP is disgruntled and is using LI to air personal grudges. I am also sorry to say that there is an element of politics in this.
Pentagram will happen for sure, hopefully better than last time.
>people don't show up for these events (because the SAC is damn unpopular)
>exemptions are given to people for committees they're not a part of (which is a major allegation and the reason why teachers have been against the SAC)
>they're skipping classes to organise nonsense like valentine's day (why would a student committee be needed for this??)