We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
You would be contributing towards the pension fund from your salary (a fixed percentage of your basic + DA) and the employer would match that every year. You may contribute more voluntarily. This holds true for NPS.
There are tax breaks available on the money so contributed from your side up to a certain level.
After the start of the NPS, government officers (central and state) do not receive pensions like in the past. A portion of the NPS is used to buy an annuity, giving a monthly "pension". Effectively, the employee funds his/her pension because the quantum of the annuity (and the monthly amount one gets) depends on how much one can save into the NPS.
People are living longer, hence traditional pensions are a heavy burden on the exchequer and financially unsustainable. NPS is now the norm.