If I'm writing a paper on "comparison of state surveillance in the world", is it a constitutional, HR, international or digital/data topic ?? My IL prof says it doesn't come under IL !?

Why should it be pigeonholed? It can be about more than one discipline based on the research questions and scope.

Cause my IL prof sux and states it's more of a digital topic and not a international law one. And I need to change. Despite telling him that comparative international law exists.

Best answer. Follow this OP. Ignore the retard downstairs who's just an angry troll.

OP himself has been proven to be an angry troll below.

IL is generally seen as public or private international law and not comparative law. Your topic is more on comparative (constitutional) law

So let's say if I want to do a topic on "state surveillance vs data privacy" in terms of IL and not consti law. How do I spin it ?? I really love this topic. I was thinking about comparing how different legal systems are or are not protecting privacy vis-a-vis surveillance. But how do I write it as an IL paper. My IL prof sux.

Clearly you do not have clarity about the fundamentals of IL, otherwise you would have understood on your own the difference between that and comparing the domestic legal systems of multiple countries on any topic. Your professor is right to point out that the latter cannot be the subject of an IL paper, and doesn't really "sux". What you can do instead is to approach it from the angle of international treaties or conventions about acceptable degrees of surveillance and data if any, how the signatories have sought to implement their obligations under such treaty, reservations placed by them if any and so on. Then it is theoretically possible to connect it with principles of IL. However, I am not sure about why you wish to force this topic into the IL framework. If you want to work/write on it, do that separately and get it published. Public International Law does not cover all the aspects of law and comparative jurisprudence, really.

I just like the topic. That's all. If you have to work on something that should be an elective in the first place, at least it should be something that's interesting. State surveillance is definitely a major issue, so is privacy rights. If you know so much about IL and it's fundamentals then suggest me some topics. But I know you won't... you'll say just two things..

one. do your own research. Or two. Suggest me some tried and tested old topics of IL that has been done by majority.

Shouldn't we do things that are innovative or current in trend then the same old jurisdiction and icc and icj and how unsc is failing us. Same crap over and over.

Also there's something called comparative international law. Google it. Byeeeeee

It is clear from your attitude why you find your faculty to be less than cooperative and accommodating. Innovative or trendy topics does not mean you don't understand the basics of a subject and try to forcefully fit whatever topic you have in mind within its scope. Comparative international law does not have anything to do with comparing domestic systems of multiple nations. If only you read some real academic literature after 'googling it', then you would have known about it. It is clear that you do not seek any real help, but are just here to troll. As for you deciding what should be elective or core, you lack any qualification whatsoever about the same; fortunately people more qualified and wiser than you are still getting to decide that.

Domestic systems are the basis for comparison in international law as well. You need to read more. Courtesy - IL prof teaching abroad.

Basis for comparison, yes. In isolation and totality, a comparison is not the subject of international law without contextualising it and discussing a host of other things that the OP is clearly unwilling to do.

You seem like a juvenile CLAT aspirant rather than a law student in their 3rd year. Marital rape is also considered a major issue or concern, are people supposed to write an international law project on that? What ridiculous argument! Why don't you try to read IL first? Of course people are going to ask you to do your research first, that's the very point of a student assignment! Such entitlement and laziness!

Looks like you don't have a habit of reading or keeping up with the current affairs. Because there have been numerous articles and reasearch papers on domestic laws like martial rape and abortion as well. Most of them written by legal experts working in UN, EU and even pvt IL specific firms. OP it's all about doing what you want.

Don't listen to these fools here. What I would suggest is prepare an outline of what you want to present. Especially with how it's relevant and falls within the ambit of IL. Then approach your professor.

The problem with most IL or HR professors is that they're not an expert on it and have just been given the subject because the university couldn't find a suitable expert. Moreover these are old geezers who are apprehensive about touching new topics since they will have to take the extra burden of being up-to-date with the topic and that is something their lazy bums will not want to do.

I've seen plenty of time where these professors would not touch anything related to digital areas, data, ai etc cause it's new for them as well. But it's your job to convince them that you know what you're doing. Ask for guidance in research not on topic. Simple as that.

So someone working at the UN publishing a paper automatically makes it part of international law? God save us from buffoons trying to pose as experts.

It does become a "source" of IL. Just like a masters level thesis can also become a "source" when published. When was IL bound by any law when all of it is just recommendation and suggestions. 1st make it binding then talk about persuasive attributes, you moron !

Best advice. Ignore others.

your professor is right. additionally, they won't grade you well if you try and find a loophole to write on something that they say is not the correct subject matter to begin with

Can you tell me if all types of warfare are part of IL ???

IL as a subject sux. Sovereignty rulz.

So you exercise your sovereignty and write whatever you like. It may get binned, just like IL. Good lux.

A 11-word comment posted 3 months ago was not published.