We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Solution for a woman- get married without a job.
Surely the employed man won't extract housework from a unemployed wife and make her a servant.
Instead earn well. Spend on parents and yourself. Do your own household or earn enough to pay a maid. No need to take on extra burden with an unemployed wife and 21 years of kid raising, to only in the end be called a misogynist.
The 'unemployed' wife will have more than enough for food, clothing, shelter, shopping etc. But imagine an unemployed husband ? He's going to the streets the next day. Divorce? No job. You still pay.
Even a servant is doing "work" and getting paid for it. Women want to do nothing and still get paid for everything. Leeches I tell you.
You're a female, chill. Seek women reservation in exams and in higher education. At the same time go till PhD. Become an asst prof via reservation.
And once you're done failing everywhere, just settle for an arranged marriage with a wealthy guy. Or marry now & simultaneously keep giving exams.
Chill you're a women. And no matter what these pseudo feminist say. You will not have to bear the burden of being the bread earner for the family. It's an option for you. Not mandatory!
2.arrange marriage with a rich guy involves very high dowry brunt and be treated like a servant doing all the housework and face abuse.
Please keep your andrew tate bs with yourself. I know many of us can connect with our housewife mom's who didn't exactly enjoy a happy life with their husband's.
And yes, there is women reservation in services.
Then maybe advise this woman to be independent and strong and not become a servant and sex doll
2. Arrange marriage still involves a choice beforehand. Go through profiles and settle for ones that won't take dowry. However the point being females still have the option to drop everything and stay at home. Men do not. Whether you suffer, fail or can't make it in life you will still have to "pay". Look at alimony claims. No work, no pay, yet the man has to pay matrimonial dues, even to the point of infidelity by women.
3. Not a fan of that stupid baldy. But the truth is, even if you're housewife mum didn't enjoy life, she could still sustain herself without working one day. Tell me a place where a househusband will be given the same due respect by society? Even his own family will think he's a cuck. The truth is married women still have the 'privilege' to pursue education or job after marriage condition to husband's approval. However, that point doesn't even exist for men. They will at any cost have to work if married. They can't afford to sit at home and play house husband.
Unmarried/married with or without child, a guy will still have to work, earn and pay taxes .
On the other hand, unmarried women get taken care of by parents or siblings. Married women get taken care of by husbands. Married with children, in later years get taken care of by children. Don't need to work, don't need to pay taxes, eat, sleep, live comfortably under a roof. Yet "didn't enjoy life" bs !
Read Nari Shakti Vandan Bill, 2023
If you were male
1. You wouldnt be sexually harassed everyday
2. You wouldnt be pressured from 19 yrs old to get married (a.k.a. become a servant and sex doll)
3. You would be known for your merit and not looks. Because most men are just obnoxious and make sexual advances without any knowledge of consent.
If those advances are accepted- You are a slut and will remain in your plum post without any respect at the mercy of the man.
If those advances are rejected- You will be humiliated, ghosted and treated like shit by the man
Result- Your career is fucked and its your fault.
if you are a man, its your merit and none of this bs.
4. you wouldnt be pressured by your spouse to become a free servant at home and then be called jobless and "bimbos" by men like you on LI.
the list goes on. Dont worry sir. The women centric laws are on paper. please visit a local court to know how many rape accused get sent to prison/ how much alimony is actually paid by abusive husbands/ the cross examination of marital abuse victims just to get a damn divorce (the injuries very much visible and horrendous).
Unless you have to think for 10 minutes before opening the door as to how to save yourself from that random hand touching your private parts again today, like everyday, for the 27th year in your life, it is easy to do the whataboutism about the false cases.
Groping and harassment are definitely worse. But they don't make you lose your job, wealth or connections. Moreover the woman are the real victims here, whereas in a false case they pretend to be one.
The problem is feminism of this generation is all about calling out the bullies instead of proving them wrong.
Just look at the divorce judgements. No work and no pay, still have to. Cause you're the MAN.
Preferably try to have a Plan B for yourself though, so that you feel more confident.