We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
For hegde, tweeting and commentary is something he actually enjoys.
Coming to Nandy and Deepak, both are exactly same.
Except that they are from opposite sides of political spectrum.
Neither of them are good lawyers.
Hegde is a senior advocate.
Menaka is far better. Humble. Knows how to carry a point and carry it with intelligence.
JSD knows his stuff but tends to get carried away at times. He needs to rope in the right wing bit.
Hegde is good but needs to reel in a bit.
What I don't get is how they have the time to do all this if they have a busy practice?