We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
What they shouldn't do is give lectures of diversity, peace and harmony.
CJI Chandrachud in survey of Gyanwapi Mandir Case has already held that while the Places of Worship Act forbids change in RELIGIOUS CHARACTER of a place, it does not bar ascertainment of the RELIGIOUS CHARACTER of that place. Accordingly, the survey was allowed.
Hand the land to the Hindu community, like in Ayodhya?Keep the land with the Muslim community, fixing the cutoff date as 1947 and not before?