We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Cut to present time:- The consortium released a hilariously easy clat paper where apparently GK was also given right in the passage. I mean wtf lol? The English passages were so basic and honestly not a lot of right-minded students are entering the top tier colleges under clat now (I mean tier-1 colleges till NLIU). AILET still came moderate, but a lot more aspirants sit for clat (they anyway avoid AILET for the difficulty). So there’s much more impact in terms of career destroyed when clat releases a fucked-up paper. Well done!