We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
So first of all you have basically made an absolute mockery of the whole exam. You have turned the paper which was competitive since the past many years, to a Guessing game where for every Question people were needed to guess the answers. I know that the paper was made by GNLU profs (since GNLU was the CLAT Consortium Head this time).
One example of a Question which was asked was this:-
- In which principle of Rio Declaration is 'Precautionary Principle's explained?
Like is this even a Q to ask, like how is it relevant to the practical world. Like I have never seen such incompetent and absolutely irrelevant Qs being asked. Students for this were asked to guess the answers to all the questions, since the Qs were so useless that no sane person could answer. I have no hesitation in saying that the CLAT PG makers have led to a drastic decline in the overall reputation of the exam itself and have made a laughing stock out of themselves. Add to that they released an answer key which was again re-uploaded and again re-uploaded. What an absolute waste of time.
You have not only spilrd students lives, but also ensured that students who didn't study but are good at guessing score more marks. You have led the compromise and shaken the belief of the students, and we all are hanging out heads in shame today to have given such an exam. You have spoiled students time, energy, money everything, just for deriving sadistic pleasure to see the students suffer and so that you could enjoy the coaching mates of mine have been sending suicidal messages to me post the exam, how am I supposed to respond to that. You have made it a guessing paper, whoever guess the most answers wins the prize.
Your absolutely lack of accountability is actually shameless to say the least. Atleast there could have been an apology or rightfully an immediate re-test should be conducted.
I am writing this thread so that a Re-Test should be conducted or it should be conducted again so that the best of 2 scores can be considered. And pls don't let these Profs make the ppr again in their lives, they would be more than willing to again derive sadistic pleasure out of it. Look at the previous year pprs and learn something from them, pls learn. And till then let me check with my friends who have been sending me disturbing messages.
I know nothing might come out of this message but it's better to make it public than keeping it confined. And to all those who r having suicidal thoughts, I can assure you that even though we have been done hard, but we will emerged stronger and ensure that in the future such Profs don't get to spoil students lives. #CLATPG ReTest Deserved