We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Kya kaam sikha bhai law firm se ?!
JAY SHAH.
..
....all these words are there in the dictionary
Whom we have elected as our PM? Ask our soldiers, bureaucrats, sportsmen, policy-makers, etc. Also ask people from 80's and early 90's. We have seen times where every festival or occasion, some part of the country was on red-alert for terrorist attack.
Australia raised their game for the Finals. They had plans for each and every player for each segment of the game. They must have saved at least 3 boundaries in first 5 overs which lead to Gill's downfall and Rohit pushing the envelope in last two balls of the PP to take the advantage. Here are few instances which led to our downfall: 1) Deep Point, bowling outside off-stump: Australia's had deep point for Rohit in PP which gave the bowlers the liberty to bowl outside off (Starc) and followed it up with bouncers with Deep Square, Rohit almost fell in the trap twice. Their fielding was top notch, as per my count, at least 6 boundaries were saved in first 10 overs.
2) Maxwell in PP: Ideally we see captains introducing spinners after PP, however, Maxwell was introduced within 10 overs despite RS and VK in middle. Cummins made him purchase the wicket for few boundaries / sixes. Rohit fell in 9.5 overs, we just had two more balls for PP to get over. In my view, we lost the momentum when RS fell, according to me, RS in middle for 25 overs is enough for any opposition to unsettle their bowling but team management has other views.
3) 15 to 30 overs (no pace): Australians mixed the pace well during the middle overs. This move not did unsettle Virat with his momentum but eventually led to downfall of Iyer. Virat had to struggle for boundaries due to lack of pace and outstanding fielding, however, with downfall of Iyer, KL and VK had to rebuild.
4) KL tied up: Australians came well prepared against their last match nemeses - KL Rahul. They no only kept it tight but even the shorter balls planned with short square leg and short fine leg in place. He was not fed anything on good length outside off, everything was short of good length or short and at the stumps which made it really difficult for KL to play horizontal bat shots due to lack of bounce and pace.
5) Final overs: They had a plan for SKY! He was bowled short but only off cutters. This did not give him any pace to play behind the bowlers or WK. Infact one of the upper cut did not go for boundary but to the third man, as third man was strategically placed behind the gully/third slip instead of being fine.
I can go on but it will be too long. Australia owned the first half! Cummins was terrific with his captainship.
India's bowling:
I do not have much to add. I feel we were not up for the game. We tried too many things to make things happen. Except for Shami and Bumrah, the bowling was toothless. They nullified the impact of Jadeja and Kuldeep by rotating the strike consistently. I felt we had to create the opportunity instead of waiting for things to happen, when spinners were bowling. Having said that, Travis Head was lucky throughout the innings. There was no foot moment, no trigger movement, getting beaten by the pace, etc but it was his day, from the catch to batting innings, he was terrific.
Conclude: India lacked to raise the game for finals. It felt that management wanted to follow the same template as they have been doing over for 10 games and wait for the things to happen but Australia prepared well, tactically and executed each plan to perfection.
According to me, these were the reasons for our loss.
B. Social Media Drama
1) Pitch: Irrespective of the pitch, we are suppose to perform and deliver. One cannot say that the court is in remote area with lack of parking space, I cannot visit and defend my client or that's the reason for loss. That only shows the immaturity of the viewer. Semi final was played on similar pitch. Australia ends up winning all the finals irrespective of the format, they must be doing things differently, need to learn from them.
2) Jay Shah: I am no one to judge and comment on his qualification / experience. I have no idea from where he has jumped to the scene in last couple of years. It feels like he has been parachuted in this set-up. Last I saw, it was Niranjan Shah, followed by Jaydev Shah in the race for helm of affairs at BCCI but it was Jay Shah who eventually won (for obvious reasons). I don't think he has done any harm to game, its just that people in the cubicles are jealous of him and of every other kid who father is rich and powerful! I am sure we all must have advised or advising the Companies whose promoter happens to be a promoter as his dad is the actual 'Promoter'. He COULD be one of them.
3) Stadium and Crowd: We need to understand that we are hosting a marquee event where the whole world is watching. This will have direct impact on all the stakeholders and also gives us an opportunity to showcase our capabilities. Therefore, to put our best foot forward, invariably it will be Ahmedabad, as its the biggest and most advanced stadium in India. I think BCCI is trying to compete with the likes of MCG - Australia, Lords- England, Jo'burg - S. Africa.
Crowd, I am hearing this for the first time, where we are discussing 'Crowds' of various stadiums. BTW recent two editions of IPL was won by the team from this city, but there was no discussion of the 'rubbish crowd' ever. What wrong did the crowd do ? I mean have they been given any role in the stands for which they have paid ? People all over from India has flocked to the city, we need to also acknowledge the game had no momentum in India's favour except for few overs. Eden is also great option but lets not talk about its history with ICC events.
If we go by social media verdict, I think all the games should be played at CCI, forget Wankhede. :)
This move screamed defensiveness and cowardice as they did not believe in abilities of our 11 players to counter any pitch and that too after decimating opponents (till and during semifinal)
That made the toss even more important and when they lost it and the pitch became sluggish in first half , they had no answer to the cutters, slower deliveries. All our batsmen actually enjoy pace on ball better and truer pitch might have made it a better if not a fair contest.
Guess nobody on any news channel speaking about that.
Australia on the other hand exploited this very well in first half and even when tested, came counter-punching.
Earlier, you have done many times unethical tactics against Bangladesh, this is all about GOD gifted punishment.
- a localite who went to see the match.
=================================================================================
https://www.indiatoday.in/trending-news/story/internet-slams-ahmedabad-crowd-for-disrespecting-players-during-world-cup-final-2465095-2023-11-20
Kya law firm mai kaam karte ho kya jo dimaag hila hua hai aapka?😂
Shreyas and Shubhman Gill - Irresponsible out
Rohit Sharma - needed to be more careful, this was not any other match
Kohli - same thing
KL Rahul - waste
It's very easy to say things after match is over but had they introduced Ashwin and still lost y'all would be saying why tinker with the winning combo.
Also in the past matches Shiraj wasn't getting wickets and was leaking too many runs, and because the total was low they wanted early. Wickets that's why they got Shami early, unfortunately it didn't work.
Also Ahemdabad Crowd is so bad, they stop cheering for players when the game seems to be going on the other camp, it was painful seeing Kohli asking them to cheer.
And not just pitch, but the entire field. Players go for a skid in order to stop a ball, aur soil ukhad ke bahar aa jaata hai.😂
1. Slow innings by KL Rahul (always maintained he's overrated and a statpadder)
2. SKY (another overrated guy)
3. Non-selection of Ashwin instead of Siraj: would have strengthened both batting and bowling
4. Nonsensical decision to give Shami the new ball and promote Jadeja to 6, changing previous patterns.
What have we elected as our PM?
Rubbish pitch. On top of that rubbish crowd. You have Wankhede, Eden and Chinnaswamy, yet you choose NAMO stadium Ahmedabad. Why? To satisfy the ego of Jay Shah and his political masters. And what are Jay Shah's qualifications to head the BCCI? A BIG FAT ZERO. This clown must resign...