We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
While it is true for GC, the placement prospects for people opting for disputes has been dismal this year. I am from T1 NLU and some of my brightest batchmates with excellent CVs had to struggle on Day Z just because Disputes was their non-negotiable preference. You can verify this from NLS, NALSAR, NUJS folks. There are simply too many people going for Disputes these days and there is relatively less attrition in Disputes compared to GC. So, if you are seeking a PPO or better prospects on Day Z, go for a safer option like GC.
Trilegal, I have seen Bombay and Delhi offices giving out PPOs in Disputes, but not so generously, very selective.