We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
There is a reason that procedural laws have provisions like order 6 rule 17 , sec 153.
There are "material errors" which can classify as implied admission and "non- material errors".
If you go on a T-1 Judgmental Spree over basic grammatical errors then I hope you also .
This illogical anxiety of partners at T-1 and gaslighting is the reason that Junior Associates are made to go through 100 pages of draft for simple grammatical mistakes - costing them their mental health in the long run. No wonder T-1s have high attrition these days.
Rather than answering and being a bit helpful. You are just being lowkey sarcastic in an anonymous forum and gaining validation for yourself.
Sir 2020 Grad (B.com then L.LB), Tried my hand in litigation (PQE 2) , really frustrated. Non-nlu , trying to break into corporate law firm (Gen corp field)
Any tips ? Suggestions ? Should I persist or switch career ? Is my goal feasible ? Will firms take us ?
Lala and Lala LLP were and continue to remain top tyre.
Mama and Co., Tridev and Kheti and Co. trying hard.
Apart from that, the range of work that they do and their clientele is great. Certainly puts them in the T1 bracket for B&F in my books.
Cant particularly comment on LL