We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Prejudice that flows from ignorance or generational/ inherited insecurity isn't intelligence.
In essence, my write-up would be a detailed portrait of Bengal with all her scars— and, of all things, not start with Mahua Moitra’s side profile dressed in designer clothes!
I would gather perspectives from the governed, not from a Mahua’s criminal attorney (Rebecca John)! As I was reading Rebecca Johns's glowing character certificate for Mahua, I was reminded of Ram Jethmalani - when he took the stage in defence of his client, Harshad Mehta. For those of you who don't know who Harshad Mehta is, watch “Scam 1992: The Harshad Mehta Story”. I'll leave to all with this - https://t.ly/0HAhT
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/296064-not-all-feminists-are-snowflakes
https://youtube.com/shorts/IU4xtP7O17I?si=hqRWwlbaQ4bVj5hG