We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
We are now religious but not remotely close to God. We are patriotic but unconcerned about Earth.
The man who fired the bullet dropped the bomb is me.
The man, woman and child who died are all me.
I am witness, executioner and deceased.
Israel is me. Palestine is me.
I am winning. I am losing.
I will remember. I will forget.
Drops of blood, drops of tears, in an Ocean of Suffering.
Sorry if this didn't aid your survey, or if I have offended anyone.
Palestinians are not hamas. For palestinians to have any sort of secure future- hamas must be destroyed.
Not all israeli policy is good. Netanyahu sucks- but morally israel is the right side of history.
Theres only one moral side to the british/ Indian terrorists conflict- that has always been british. Any other position would be ignorant or moral equivocation or fallacious thinking. The other side are terrorists who provoke violence by committing massacres and hide behind babies and women to make their political goals seem virtuous. Ask yourself why you would need to do that if your political goals were virtuous to start with? What kind of resistance involves rape and child murder?
Indians are not HRA/INA. For Indians to have any sort of secure future- HRA/INA must be destroyed.
Not all British policy is good. Churchill sucks- but morally British is the right side of history.