We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
he was not even in the top 30 of the batch, let alone in top 5%, which is the min requirement for BCL
After a major lapse in the implementation of the 75% attendance policy last semester, BCI has given a warning to GNLU to immediately ensure compliance. As an outcome, many students names were withheld from giving regular examinations. Infact one prominent core SAC member was asked to leave the exam in the middle since he chose to sit for the exam without clearing the attendance.
But what we saw later is that while this norm made it difficult for physically disabled students and students with genuine causes, the backdoor approval continued to allow some final year students such as the Convenor of a major committee to clear their names by speaking to the management. This is a gross abuse of power that needs to be checked.