FYI Rashmi Samant is former President of the Oxford Union and author of A Hindu at Oxford. A prominent RW influencer. The prof she is attacking is the same left-wing prof whose email regarding the pro-Palestine event was leaked (the email supporting the event and attacking the corp law prof who had criticised the event).

https://twitter.com/RashmiDVS/status/1720450970566758848

During Covid, OpIndia and other pro-BJP sites/handles had shared video clips by JGLS profs. For example, one prof (an NLU alum) had said that Kashmir does not belong to India. Another prof ( a DU LLB alum) had quoted Prof Upendra Baxi and said that that caste discrimination is intrinsic to Hinduism. These clips were recorded by students and leaked online. OpIndia did stories on them. In those days, lectures were held online , so it was easy to record. This time, the clip was obviously recored covertly using a mobile by a student in the classroom.

Now, the question to ask is whether there is any public interest in leaking these clips? In the the Kashmir and caste examples, it could be said that the profs were exercising their right to free speech and did not do anything unethical per se. In this case, does the same principle apply?? Can you show a random person's Bumble profile and mock Amity?

Thoughts?

Correct. The Palestine solidarity movement receives millions in funding from wealthy states and donors, who make it a trendy and glamorous cause on social media. In contrast, Afghans, Uyghurs, Baluchis, Tibetans and Pakistani Hindus are neglected. The students of NLUs/Jindal will mindlessly support any trendy hashtag, hence the support for Palestine.