While this is true, student interest in corporate law in RML is quite limited. In my batch, only 15-20 people were seriously pursuing corporate jobs. Out of these, aleast 80 per cent are placed.
When I use the word "pursuing", I refer to individuals who are seriously trying their hand at law firms by doing internships, cold e-mailing partners months in advance, maintaining a decent CGPA and writing corporate law articles.
The problem with the complaint of RML having no "corporate culture" is that it is most often made by the 50-80 people who reach their 4th or 5th year after having not placed any emphasis on the above-mentioned factors during their formative years of college. If the argument is that other people in T1 colleges are just handed jobs without doing anything but the same is not the case in RML; then there may be some merit to that argument (I am not aware of the status of students in other colleges); but if the argument is that even those who work hard towards a corporate career in RML are not afforded an opportunity, I would disagree.
yes sir, the University is not "employing" the students, they must provide such stature that attracts law firms. The abysmal placements of the university is therefore a huge problem.
Actually, trollish need not be only consisting of lies. It has got more to do with how one is presenting the data, associated comments, context and apparent intention. I do not agree with many Mod decisions, especially taken by the Mod who has commented below, but this one is not very off the mark. I don't even agree with his comment, because based on that standard, apart from 1-2 NLUs which release official placement data anymore, discussion and comments about no other NLU placement scene should be continued in this forum. However, the OP's post here has been marked trollish and not contested. LI readers can and ought to figure out the difference.
We will wait for genuine figures to appear. This does not give anyone the right to unnecessarily slam a college based on vague research. LI appreciates constructive criticism, but the approach should be sensible not stupid.
If placement is the only criterion for choosing the place of study (as is the case on this platform), then this will happen. Universities are not placement agencies.
Trollish means, when a post tends to mislead with false information. This data is absolutely true. Can you fking wait for other RML students to verify/ deny this before you make your little judgement?
Appeal to all aspirants, please avoid RML at all costs. There is absolutely no college reputation in the law firm circles. Going to CLC/GLC would be way better than whatever this college is
When I use the word "pursuing", I refer to individuals who are seriously trying their hand at law firms by doing internships, cold e-mailing partners months in advance, maintaining a decent CGPA and writing corporate law articles.
The problem with the complaint of RML having no "corporate culture" is that it is most often made by the 50-80 people who reach their 4th or 5th year after having not placed any emphasis on the above-mentioned factors during their formative years of college. If the argument is that other people in T1 colleges are just handed jobs without doing anything but the same is not the case in RML; then there may be some merit to that argument (I am not aware of the status of students in other colleges); but if the argument is that even those who work hard towards a corporate career in RML are not afforded an opportunity, I would disagree.
Currently working in a corp firm and ex-RML.
Even in a peak hiring year, just around 6 people from RML got placed
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/278055-rml-placements-2023-bad-as-ever
Already exposed here ^
What went wrong in 2024?
Threads promoting hatred will not be tolerated.
Trollish means, when a post tends to mislead with false information. This data is absolutely true. Can you fking wait for other RML students to verify/ deny this before you make your little judgement?