We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Money is bad part in litigation for the initial years. In a metro city, it's an almost sure shot that you will earn tremendously if you work hard down the line for some 3-4 years. But meagre pay in initial years, high working hours (may range from 10-14 depending upon who you work with) and lack of invigorating tasks drive many people out of this field.
Really want to have a discussion about this with someone having a better idea.
I'm considering trying litigation (have very little experience) and leaving the venture, but as a first-generation, I'm not sure if it's feasible. I definitely don't want to return to a desk job at a law firm, and then, there's the issue of gap in my CV.
My peers have settled into their career paths, and I'm still figuring out if I should stick with my venture or go for the litigation. Any advice or shared experiences would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!