We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Are you also a victim of whatsaap university?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thefederal.com/amp/news/lawyer-seen-beside-sonia-gandhi-in-2019-photo-not-justice-muralidhar/
And even if he represented them in his capacity as a lawyer, how is that an issue?
u u lalit repped tadipar but that didn't stop him from being arguably the best cji in years.
In continuation of the above comment. This is where the judge finally went after retirement Lol. The OP has just showcased his/her hypocrisy.
The Hon’ble Judge you are talking about is the best High Court judge one could ask for and we know how he was prevented from getting a well deserved promotion to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
Shouldn't retired judges, known for their expertise in the law, consider limiting their public expressions of opinions to preserve the perception of impartiality and uphold the integrity of the legal system?