We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
https://www.newslaundry.com/2023/10/06/newsclick-fir-says-gautam-bhatia-is-key-person-who-legally-defended-vivo-xiaomi
https://thewire.in/rights/delhi-police-terror-fir-against-newsclick-names-chinese-firms-xiaomi-vivo-puts-lawyers-in-crosshairses.
Bar & Bench: "The FIR names the following persons as shareholders of NewsClick - Prabir Purkayastha, Amit Sengupta, Doraeeswami Raghunandan, Bappaditya Sinha, Gautam Navlakha, Geeta Hariharan and Amit Chakraborty. Notably, the FIR mentions that Purkayastha, Neville Roy Singham, Geeta Hariharan and Gautam 'Bhatia' conspired to create a legal community networkto campaign for and put up spirited defense in cases against these companies."
Newslaundry: "The FIR alleges that “Shri Gautam Bhatia (key person) conspired to create a Legal Community Network in India to campaign for and put up spirited defence of legal cases against aforementioned Chinese telecom companies in return for benefits by these telecom companies”
The Wire: "The best known and most visible lawyer carrying that name is the author of widely acclaimed books on the constitution and free speech, and his court practice has tended to be narrowly focused on human rights related cases. He is not known to have had any dealings with telecom firms, let alone Chinese ones."
Incidentally, the page of Neville Roy Singham's company names Geeta Hariharan's son (another NLSIU alum) as working with NRS (Rishabh Bailey). But Rishabh Bailey has not been named in the FIR, only his mother and Gautam Bhatia.
https://www.thoughtworks.com/en-in/profiles/r/rishab-bailey-1
Returning to Gautam Bhatia, the Newsclick website has featured him a few times, but nothing very glaring. I also cannot find any links between him and Xiaomi and Vivo.
https://www.newsclick.in/author/gautam-bhatia
What proof does the govt have? It’s just baseless rubbish. Alumni from NLSIU and all NLUs must issue a statement condemning this.
Arghya isn't equal to anyone on the list except maybe Menaka.
#StandWithGautam
Gautam can only be charged if he actually took part in any sort of money laundering or was leaking secrets to Chinese intelligence. Which is obviously not the charge. So WTF is going on??
"It is UNPRECEDENTED that a lawyer can be named in an FIR for providing legal defence to a client. Every entity is entitled to a legal defence & lawyers cannot be charged no matter what the accusations against their client company are. Delhi Police has clearly filed a frivolous FIR against NewsClick which has no merits and has purely been done out of the vendetta of Modi & Shah. Invoking terror charges has only been done to ensure that the journalists stay in jail as long as possible before they get acquitted because the process is the punishment."
https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2023/oct/07/newsclick-case-police-fir-names-lawyer-gautam-bhatia-cites-his-legal-defence-for-xiaomi-and-vivo-2621765.html
“The day that a lawyer can be deterred from taking a brief that he would have normally taken, that is the beginning of a police state,” Hegde told The Telegraph.“This is a testing of the waters by the police. They have not yet named the lawyer as an accused. He has only been named as a ‘key person’ right now."
https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/supreme-court-advocate-sanjay-hegde-sounds-police-state-alarm-over-newsclick-fir/cid/1972032
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/not-a-penny-has-come-from-china-newsclick-founder-prabir-purkayastha-tells-delhi-high-court-4464601
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ed-arrests-4-vivo-executives-in-money-laundering-case/articleshow/104313709.cms?from=mdr