We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
So itβs all politics at the end of the day, coupled with the attitude of Gen Z. NUJS is merely a symptom not the disease. And itβs happening elsewhere too. Look at GNLU.
Now RW mods will mark this as trollish.
Kian employed ex IT cell labourers as mods.
Lately, you must've seen plenty of posts on NUJS. It's not that we did not try to resolve these matters internally, but almost every attempt led in a complete failure. It escalated so much that we witnessed our first mass protests on campus post Covid. Only after that, some grievances were amicably resolved.
Another reason behind more publicity is probably how the admin itself tried to suppress our freedom of speech. When the Bsc LLB course was introduced (with no consultation with rest of the GB or anyone), a student from 4th year circulated a document stating why people should enrolling. Nothing in the document was defamatory in any matter, and did not degrade anyone outright. It mostly mentioned the excessive high fees, poor placement prospective for the new batch and lack of space on the main campus. Yet, the VC was so offended with the move that he publicly show-caused the student for merely expressing his own opinion in his individual capacity. He has become completely intolerant to any form of criticism, which is the reason why more and more students are resorting to anonymous platforms like Legally India to vent out their concerns. NUJS has always prided itself for having a liberal and open-minded atmosphere; but the recent acts by the admin completely goes against the ethos of the university. I agree that "academic rigor" should not be compromised, but none of the admin's new moves would help to bolster it in any manner.
P.S: If someone from the college administration / pro-admin people is reading this, take a deep breath before you are offended once again. Sending more show-cause notices to students would not help to contain spread of college gossip on public forums, but do the EXACT OPPOSITE. Instead, have constructive talks with the GB and at least try to understand our issues.
Signing off, have a good day.